PROS AND CONS OF INBREEDING
Copyright 1996, 2001,
2003 Sarah Hartwell
Inbreeding is the mating together of closely related cats, for example
mother/son, father/daughter, sibling/sibling matings and
half-sibling/half-sibling. It is the pairing of animals which are more
closely related than the average population. For breeders, it is a useful way of
fixing traits in a breed - the pedigrees of some exhibition cats show that many
of their forebears are closely related. For example, the name of Fan Tee Cee
(shown in the 1960s and 1970s) appeared in more and more Siamese pedigrees,
sometimes several times in a single pedigree, as breeders were anxious to make
their lines more typey. Superb specimens are always much sought after for stud
services or offspring (unless they have already been neutered; cloning may solve
that problem in the future) having won the approval of show judges.
To produce cats which closely meet the breed standard, breeders commonly
mate together animals which are related and which share desirable
characteristics. Over time, sometimes only one or two generations, those
characteristics will become homozygous (genetically uniform) and all offspring
of the inbred animal will inherit the genes for those characteristics (breed
true). Breeders can predict how the offspring will look. "Line-breeding" is not
a term used by geneticists, but comes from livestock husbandry. It indicates
milder forms of inbreeding. Line-breeding is still a form of inbreeding i.e.
breeding within a family line and includes cousin/cousin, aunt/nephew,
niece/uncle and grandparent/grandchild. The difference between
line-breeding and inbreeding may be defined differently for different species of
animals and even for different breeds within the same species. It is complicated
by the fact that a cat's half-brother might also be her father!
However, inbreeding holds potential problems. The limited gene-pool caused
by continued inbreeding means that deleterious genes become widespread and the
breed loses vigour. Laboratory animal suppliers depend on this to create uniform
strains of animal which are immuno-depressed or breed true for a particular
disorder e.g. epilepsy. Such animals are so inbred as to be genetically
identical (clones!), a situation normally only seen in identical twins.
Similarly, a controlled amount of inbreeding can be used to fix desirable traits
in farm livestock e.g. milk yield, lean/fat ratios, rate of growth etc. In human
terms, inbreeding is considered incest; cats do not have incest taboos.
Outcrossing is when the two parents are totally unrelated. In pedigree
animals, this often means where a common ancestor does not occur behind either
parent within a four or five generation pedigree. In animals with a small
foundation gene pool, this condition is difficult to meet.
First I will define some terms used by animal breeders. In general I've
avoided specialist terms, but you will meet these terms outside of this
article.
Homozygous means having inherited the same "gene" for a particular
trait from both parent e.g. for fur length. Barring random mutation, 100% of the
offspring of a homozygous individual will inherit that gene. Inbreeding
increases homozygosity by "fixing" a particular trait. Purebred animals display
a high degree of homozygosity compared to mixed breeds and random-bred animals.
The idea of purebred animals is that they should "breed true". When one purebred
is mated with another of the same breed, the offspring will have uniform
characteristics and will resemble the parents.
Heterozygous means having inherited a different gene for a
particular trait from each parent. For example one gene of long fur (recessive)
and one gene for short fur (dominant). 50% of a heterozygous individual's
offspring will inherit one form and 50% will inherit the other. Carefully
controlled "out-crossing" increases heterozygosity for selected traits by
introducing new genes into the hybrid offspring.
Heterosis is the scientific term for hybrid vigour. It is possible
that there are "bad" genes which produce less vigourous individuals when in the
homozygous state because good genes have been bred out along with the
undesirable characteristics; theoretically the bad genes could be bred out, but
in practice this doesn't seem to happen. The other theory is simply that you
simply need to have a mixture of two different genes to get the desired effect
as they somehow complement each other; highly inbred animals lack this diversity
and have poorer immune systems.
Sex-linked refers to a trait which is passed on, or determined by, a
particular gender. In Abyssinian cats there are several versions of the red
colour. One is sex-linked i.e. a male cat only needs one copy of the gene, but a
female needs two copies of the gene to produce the red colour.
Degree of homozygosity means the number of genes an animal is
homozygous for. If most of its genes are matched pairs it has a high degree of
homozygosity; if most of its genes are mismatched pairs it has a low degree of
homozygosity. An animal can be homozygous for some traits, but heterozygous for
others.
NATURAL OCCURRANCE OF INBREEDING
This is not to say that inbreeding does not occur naturally. A feral colony
which is isolated from other cats, by geographical or other factors, can become
very inbred especially if a dominant male mates with his sisters, then with his
daughters and grand-daughters. When he is deposed it will most likely be by his
own son or grandson which therefore continues the inbreeding. The effect of any
deleterious genes becomes noticeable in later generations as the majority of the
offspring inherit these genes. Scientists have discovered that cheetahs, even if
living in different areas, are genetically very similar. Possibly disease or
disaster drastically reduced cheetah numbers in the past creating a genetic
bottleneck. All modern day cheetahs may be descended from a single surviving
family unit hence their genetic uniformity.
In the Cheetah, the lack of genetic diversity makes them susceptible to
disease since they lack the ability to resist certain viruses. Extreme
inbreeding affects their reproductive success with small litter sizes and high
mortality rates. Some scientists hope that the appearance of the "King Cheetah",
characterised by its blotched markings, means that the Cheetah can develop a
healthier gene-pool through mutation (provided man doesn't wipe them out in the
meantime). Mankind has contributed to the loss of diversity by sport-hunting
cheetahs and reducing the number of available mates. Hunters preferred to shoot
unusual specimens (i.e. genetically diverse ones) for the trophy room and this
previously included long-haired "woolly cheetahs" and grey/blue cheetahs
indicating much greater genetic diversity in the past.
Despite the hopes of scientists, some cheetah populations are showing
further signs of inbreeding. Confined to ever-smaller areas such as wildlife
reserves, the populations have become genetically isolated from each other. In
one population there is an increasing frequency of misaligned jaws and kinked
tails. Continued inbreeding will reinforce, or fix, these traits. Ultimately,
they could reduce the cheetah's hunting effectiveness - the kinked tail will
reduce its agility and cornering ability and the misaligned jaws may not be able
to hold onto prey.
The wolf was once widespread throughout North American, but many of the
remaining packs are isolated and have become inbred. The
isolation/inbreeding problem has become so acute that conservationists have
taken wolves from one area and introduced them into a another area to revitalise
the gene pool. In some areas, the choice of mates is so reduced that wolves have
resorted to mating with domestic dogs - an extreme form of outcrossing called
hybridization. A similar situation in Scotland where the Scottish Wildcat mates
with domestic cats is threatening to wipe out the wildcat as domestic cat genes
become more widespread. These are two cases where outcrossing (following, and
followed by, inbreeding) may lead to extinction of a species (analogous to loss
of type in domestic breeds).
Another animal suffering from the effects of inbreeding is the Giant Panda.
As with the Cheetah, this has led to poor fertility among Pandas and high infant
mortality rates. As Panda populations become more isolated from one another (due
to humans blocking the routes which Pandas once used to move from one area to
another), Pandas have greater difficulty in finding a mate with a different mix
of genes and breed less successfully. It is almost inevitable that the Giant
Panda will become extinct even if cloning techniques become available since the
gene pool is now probably too impoverished for the species' long term viability.
It may, therefore, be considered that all purebred animals will ultimately
become unviable through inbreeding and that breeders must work carefully to
maintain type while slowing down the detrimental effects of selective breeding.
There have been numerous studies into inbreeding and viability. Mandarte
Island, off Vancouver, Canada is so tiny that every single song sparrow can be
ringed, monitored and matings recorded. Researchers know exactly how inbred each
individual is. When severe winter storms wiped out over 90% of the birds, Lukas
Keller of Zurich University, Switzerland found that all inbred individuals were
killed. He defined "inbred" as matings between first cousins or closer. Loeske
Kruuk, Edinburgh University, Scotland found that collared flycatchers born from
brother-sister matings were more than 90% less likely to survive to maturity
than offspring of non-incestuous matings. Ilkka Hanski of Helsinki University,
Finland found that 50% of male offspring of brother-sister matings in a certain
species of African butterfly were sterile.
Natural isolation and inbreeding have given rise to domestic cat breeds
such as the Manx which developed on an island so that the gene for taillessness
became widespread despite the problems associated with it. Apart from the odd
cat jumping ship on the Isle of Man, there was little outcrossing and the effect
of inbreeding is reflected in smaller-than-average litter sizes
(geneticists believe that more Manx kittens than previously thought are
reabsorbed due to genetic abnormality), stillbirths and spinal
abnormalities which diligent breeders have worked so hard to eliminate.
As mentioned, some feral colonies become highly inbred due to being
isolated from other cats (e.g. on a remote farm) or because other potential
mates in the area have been neutered, removing them from the gene pool. Most cat
workers dealing with ferals have encountered some of the effects of inbreeding.
Within such colonies there may be a higher than average occurrence of certain
traits. Some are not serious e.g. a predominance of calico pattern cats. Other
inherited traits which can be found in greater than average numbers in inbred
colonies include polydactyly (the most extreme case reported so far being an
American cat with 9 toes on each foot), dwarfism (although dwarf female cats can
have problems when try to deliver kittens due to the kittens' head size), other
structural deformities or a predisposition to certain inheritable conditions.
The ultimate result of continued inbreeding is terminal lack of vigour and
probable extinction as the gene pool contracts, fertility decreases,
abnormalities increase and mortality rates rise. On the other hand, too much
outcrossing will cause loss of type and therefore the loss of a distinct
breed.
SELECTIVE BREEDING
Artificial isolation (selective breeding) produces a similar effect. When
creating a new breed from an attractive mutation, the gene pool is initially
necessarily small with frequent matings between related cats. Some breeds which
resulted from spontaneous mutation have been fraught with problems such as
spasticity (cerebellar hypoplasia) in Devon Rexes, skeletal problems in Scottish
Folds and the effects of a semi-lethal gene (aka deferred lethal gene) in Manxes
and the lethal gene in Ojos Azules. Problems such as hip dysplasia and patella
luxation are more common in certain breeds and breeding lines than in others,
suggesting that past inbreeding has distributed the faulty genes. Selecting
suitable outcrosses can reintroduce healthy genes, which might otherwise be
lost, without adversely affecting type.
Just as Fan Tee Cee changed the shape of the Siamese, a cat called Good
Fortune Fortunatus in the 1970s changed the shape of Burmese cats in the United
States and gave rise to the "Contemporary" look now fashionable in that country.
American Burmese changed from being moderate, foreign-type cats into
short-nosed, round-headed, barrel-chested cats which some have described as
"pug-like". Unfortunately, the "Burmese head fault", a lethal condition that
requires euthanasia, came hand-in-hand with the "Contemporary" look. As more
people wanted the new look in their breeding lines, so the lethal defect spread.
Burmese cats in Europe, Australia and New Zealand were not influenced by the
Fortunatus lookand are free of the hereditary fault; in addition, occasional
outcrossing to introduce new colours has ensured that European lines do not
become so inbred.
Another example of a lethal gene which determines a breed trait is the
blue-eyed Ojos Azules. The gene is lethal in the homozygous form causing
stillbirth, cranial deformities, white fur and a small curled tail. In the
heterozygous form, the Ojos Azules are blue eyed non-white cats. Breeders must
therefore breed blue-eyed cats (heterozygous) to non-blue-eyed cats (lacking the
gene for the eye colour, but having the conformation) in order to get a roughly
50/50 split of blue-eyed and non-blue-eyed kittens while avoiding deformed dead
kittens.
The more that inbreeding is used to get rid of undesirable traits or to fix
a desirable trait, the more likely it is that individuals will also inherit the
same set of genes for the immune system from both parents, and be born with less
vigourous immune systems. The immune system problem is compounded over
successive generations as the animals become genetically more uniform (like the
cheetah). According to one theory, immunodeficiency may be caused by a simple
lack of heterozygosity in the genes that control the immune system. This is why
random-bred cats are generally so robust.
Breeder and author Phyllis Lauder wrote in 1981: "Favoured varieties of
today have been bred sire to daughter and cousin to cousin until their breeds
are ruined [...] man's insistence on upon breeding in order to perpetuate
features approved in the show ring has produced animals of weak constitution,
prone to such conditions as skin troubles, lacking in intelligence, no longer
mentally alert, eventually stupid; and at last breeding with difficulty: a state
of affairs leading in the end to the sterility and death of the breed."
Zoos engaged in captive breeding programs are aware of this need to
outcross their own stock to animals from other collections. Captive populations
are at risk from inbreeding since relatively few mates are available to the
animals, hence zoos must borrow animals from each other in order to maintain the
genetic diversity of offspring. In sheep, centuries of selective breeding to
improve the quality of wool has caused an important trait to be lost. Ancestral
sheep could breed more than once per year. Modern sheep breed once per year.
Only recently has the importance of the lost gene been realised (i.e. to
increase meat yield), but to reintroduce it from primitive sheep would reduce
other qualities selectively bred for over centuries.
Most laboratory mice are becoming so highly inbred that they would probably
not survive outside of a sterile laboratory due to poor immune systems (they are
generally killed before this becomes a problem in the laboratory situation) and
some strains become extinct due to reproductive failure. Many are selectively
bred to exhibit defects which will kill them.
Inbreeding holds problems for anyone involved in animal husbandry - from
canary fanciers to farmers. Early Turkish Vans were reported to be
temperamental, a problem apparently rectified by the importation of new stock.
Attempts to change the appearance of Burmese cats in America to produce a cat
with a rounder head resulted in cats with congenital problems. Siamese cats have
become progressively finer-boned as breeders strive to emphasise the foreign
look, resulting in frailer cats in some breeding lines.
In the dog world, a number of breeds now exhibit hereditary faults due to
the over-use of a particularly "typey" stud which was later found to carry a
gene detrimental to health. By the time the problems came to light they had
already become widespread as the stud had been extensively used to "improve" the
breed. In the past some breeds were crossed with dogs from different breeds in
order to improve type, but nowadays the emphasis is on preserving breed purity
and avoiding mongrels.
Those involved with minority breeds (rare breeds) of livestock face a
dilemma as they try to balance purity against the risk of genetic conformity.
Enthusiasts preserve minority breeds because their genes may prove useful to
farmers in the future, but at the same time the low numbers of the breed
involved means that it runs the risk of becoming unhealthily inbred. When trying
to bring a breed back from the point of extinction, the introduction of "new
blood" through crossing with an unrelated breed is usually a last resort because
it can change the very character of the breed being preserved (as noted by cat
fanciers when Russian Blues were crossed to Blue Point Siamese after World War
II). In livestock, successive generations of progeny must be bred back to a
purebred ancestor for 6 - 8 generations before the offspring can be considered
purebred themselves.
In the cat fancy, breed purity is equally desirable, but can be taken to
ridiculous lengths. Some fancies will not recognise "hybrid" breeds such as the
Tonkinese because it produces variants (yet Manxes are recognised and also
produce variants). Breeds which cannot produce some degree of variability among
their offspring risk finding themselves in the same predicament as Cheetahs and
Giant Pandas. Such fancies have lost sight of the fact that they are registering
"pedigree" cats, not "pure-bred" cats, especially since they may recognise
breeds which require occasional outcrossing to maintain type!
The breed purity debate goes along these lines: should a breed be based on
genotype (what genes it inherited) or phenotype (appearance, despite an
out-cross four generations ago) A Tabby-point Siamese is phenotypically Siamese,
but because the tabby pattern was introduced from non-Siamese cats,
genotype-followers consider it "not Siamese" and are worried it will pollute
their purebred breeding lines. In some registries, Exotic Longhairs are
identical to Persians, but may not be bred with Persians. Likewise, some
registries do not allow chocolate or lilac Persians to be classed as Persians
because the colours were introduced from Siamese cats (via the Himalayan breed)
umpteen generations ago and are therefore "tainted". Those "tainted" genes may
be bundled with whole lot of healthy genes; by not outcrossing "purebreds" to
"tainted" cats, the opportunity to increase the heterozygosity of the immune
system is lost (there is a footnote on
phenotype/genotype/purebred/pedigree philosophies).
One formula to reduce inbreeding and slow down the loss of vigour is to
line-breed for 2-3 generation and then out-cross to an unrelated line (or
occasionally another breed) to get back hybrid vigour and genetic diversity.
However with the emphasis on breeding for type and competitiveness on the
showbench (and when making a sale), the typey studs get used more and more often
and there is less and less chance of finding a truly unrelated line.
See The Pros and Cons of Cloning for
further discussion on inbreeding hazards should cloning of typey animals become
permissible.
IMPLICATIONS OF INBREEDING FOR THE CAT BREEDER
Most cat breeders are well aware of potential pitfalls associated with
inbreeding although it is tempting for a novice to continue to use one or two
closely related lines in order to preserve or improve type. Breeding to an
unrelated line of the same breed (where possible) or outcrossing to another
breed (where permissible) can ensure vigour. Despite the risk of importing a few
undesirable traits which may take a while to breed out, outcrossing can prevent
a breed from stagnating by introducing fresh genes into the gene pool. It is
important to outcross to a variety of different cats, considered to be
genetically "sound" (do any of their previous offspring exhibit undesirable
traits?) and preferably not closely related to each other. Outcrossing is made
difficult by the amount of inbreeding in previous generations - it becomes hard
to find cats which are not related, sometimes several times over.
How can you tell if a breed or line is becoming too closely inbred? One
sign is that of reduced fertility in either males or females. Male Cheetahs are
known to have a low fertility rate. Failure to conceive, small litter sizes and
high kitten mortality on a regular basis indicates that the cats may be becoming
too closely related. The loss of a large proportion of cats to one disease (e.g.
enteritis) indicates that the cats are losing/have lost immune system diversity.
If 50% of individuals in a breeding program die of a simple infection, there is
cause for concern.
Highly inbred cats also display abnormalities on a regular basis as "bad"
genes become more widespread. These abnormalities can be simple undesirable
characteristics such as misaligned jaws (poor bite) or more serious deformities.
Sometimes a fault can be traced to a single stud or queen which should be
removed from the breeding program even if it does exhibit exceptional type. If
its previous progeny are already breeding it's tempting to think "Pandora's Box
is already open and the damage done so I'll turn a blind eye". Ignoring the
fault and continuing to breed from the cat will cause the faulty genes to become
even more widespread in the breed, causing problems later on if its descendants
are bred together.
One breed which was almost lost because of inbreeding is the American
Bobtail. Inexperienced breeders tried to produce a colourpoint bobtailed cat
with white boots and white blaze and which bred true for type and colour, but
only succeeded in producing unhealthy inbred cats with poor temperaments. A
later breeder had to outcross the small fine-boned cats she took on, at the same
time abandoning the rules governing colour and pattern, in order to reproduce
the large, robust cats required by the standard and get the breed on a sound
genetic footing.
|
PROS
|
CONS
|
|
|
INBREEDING
(Mating of closely related individuals) |
+Produces uniform or predictable offspring.
+Hidden (recessive) genes show up and can be eliminated. +Individuals will "breed true" and are "pure." +Doubles up good genes. +Eliminates unwanted traits. |
-Doubles up on faults and weaknesses.
-Progressive loss of vigor and immune response. -Increased reproductive failures, fewer offspring. -Emphasis on appearance means accidental loss of "good" genes for other attributes. -Genetically impoverished individuals. |
|
LINE-BREEDING
(Mating of less closely related individuals) |
+Avoid inbreeding of very closely-related cats, but cats are still
"pure".
+Produces uniform or predictable offspring. +Slows genetic impoverishment. |
-Require excellent individuals.
-Does not halt genetic impoverishment, only slows it down. |
|
OUTCROSSING (Mating of unrelated individuals within the same
breed)
|
+Brings in new qualities or reintroduces lost qualities.
+Increases vigor. +Cats are still "pure". |
-Less consistency and predictability of offspring.
-May have to breed out unwanted genes accidentally introduced at same time. -May be hard to find individuals which are true outcrosses. |
|
HYBRIDIZATION (Mating of unrelated individuals of different
breeds)
|
+Brings in new qualities or reintroduces lost qualities.
+Increases vigor, may improve immune system and reproductive capacity. +Introduces totally new traits e.g. color. Fur type. +May result in new breeds. +The offspring are considered "impure" for many generations. |
-Unpredictable - new traits may not all be desirable.
-Must choose outcross breed whose qualities complement or match own breed. -May take years to eliminate unwanted traits/loss of type. -May take years to get consistent offspring. -Produces many variants not suitable for use in breeding program. |
GENOMICS
As well as recording matings and tracing pedigrees, modern biologists can
look for genetic evidence of inbreeding in an individual's genome (genomics).
Zoologist Bill Amos at Cambridge University, England analyses genetic markers to
assess how closely related an individual's parents are. This allows them to look
at the effect of inbreeding in wild populaitons, something previously difficult
or impossible as it was not possible to trace pedigrees. Although not foolproof,
blood testing and genetic analysis can indicate how closely animals are related.
As well as inheriting copies of genes from each parent, animals inherit
sections of non-coding ("junk") DNA which can be used as genetic markers and are
known as microsatellites. As well as being homozygous or heterozygous for genes,
animals can be homozygous or heterozygous for these microsatellites. Even
without inbreeding, some markers are naturally more widespread in a population
than others. Looking at several markers at a time gives a better measure of
relatedness (the more markers which can be tracked, the better the results).
Some of those markers may be next door to beneficial or harmful genes (or,
because many genes work in association with other genes, next door to genes
which are influenced by other "good" or "bad" genes elsewhere in the genome) -
in the absence of artificial selection by breeders, markers next to "good" genes
will be more widespread than those next to "bad" genes because the "bad" genes
make the animal less likely to survive.
The technique is not foolproof, but if Amos's currently controversial
calculations do turn out to be correct, inbreeding is more damaging than
previously realised and even cousin-cousin matings may result in inbreeding
depression. His studies suggest inbreeding is more important than environmental
challenges in determining an individual's chances of survival. The "degree of
microsatellite homozygosity" (what Amos calls "internal relatedness") means
the number of identical markers. Animals with high microsatellite homozygosity
fare worse than highly heterozygous individuals. In island-living wild Soay
sheep, those with higher homozygosity also had more parasitic worms and were
more likely to be sick.
Amos suggests that the disadvantages of inbreeding are more pervasive than
previous suspected. In the past, inbreeding was considered relatively
unimportant compared to environmental challenges such as finding food, finding
mates or avoiding predators. Amos suggests that animals with higher internal
relatedness produce fewer young and suffer more from disease, parasites or
cancer. In nature, inbred individuals tend not to survive; this removes harmful
mutations from the population. Inbreeding depression is known to affect the
immune system. Artificial selection by breeders means genetically weak
individuals, which would normally be weeded out by natural selection, get a
chance to pass on their mutations to another generation and, being more prone to
disease, will need more medical care during their lifetimes than less inbred
individuals.
As well as selecting animals for physical traits, it is important to select
them for health traits as the prevalence of Polycystic Kidney Disease in
Persians and Exotics demonstrates. Registries may have to permit more
outcrossing between breeds to ensure the vigour of any single breed. Currently,
many gene pools are closed (no more outcrossing) when the desired traits are
fixed and a certain population level is reached.
CONCLUSION
Inbreeding is a two-edged sword. On the one hand a certain amount of
inbreeding can fix and improve type to produce excellent quality animals. On the
other hand, excessive inbreeding can limit the gene pool so that the breed loses
vigour. Breeds in the early stages of development are most vulnerable as numbers
are small and the cats may be closely related to one another. It is up to the
responsible breeder to balance inbreeding against crossings with unrelated cats
in order to maintain the overall health of the line or breed concerned.
FOOTNOTE: THE CHEETAH
In January 2003, India announced plans to clone cheetahs to help restore
the Indian sub-continent's now extinct cheetah population. India plan to
clone cheetahs from Iran where about 50 Asiatic Cheetahs remain.
Cloning creates genetically identical individuals. However, cheetahs are
already so highly inbred that individuals are already almost genetically
identical so the impact of clones on the population will be to increase numbers
rather than further decease genetic variation. If it uses the leopard's own egg
cells it would introduce the leopard's mitochondrial DNA (the DNA found in an
egg cell) into the cheetah population.
FOOTNOTE: PUREBRED VS PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE VS GENOTYPE
There is a long-running and often bitter in several cat registries about
recognising and perpetuating breeds based on phenotype or on genotype. Phenotype
means "what it looks like" while genotype means "its genetic make-up". The
latter requires a cat's pedigree to be known over several generations and for
the pedigree to contain only cats of the same breed.
The debate has been a long-running one among breeders of Persian and
Siamese cats; this is hardly surprising as recognition of these two breeds dates
back to the dawn of the cat fancy in the 1870s and 1880s. Should the "new"
colours of Siamese (red points, tortie points etc) be recognised as Siamese or
should they be kept separate e.g. as Javanese, because their bloodlines are not
pure; the same applies to self chocolate and self lilac in Persians since these
colours came from the Siamese via the colourpoint Persian (Himalayan). Among
rare breed livestock breeders, the 7th generation offspring of an
outcross is considered purebred if each generation of offpring have been
backcrossed to a pure bred animal following the initial outcross. In cat
breeding, the only remaining trait from the outcross might be the new colour,
but among extremely pro-genotype cat breeders, that bloodline is considered
forever tainted by the outcross and will never produce "purebred" cats. Some
pro-genotype breeders admit to wanting cat fancying to remain an elite hobby,
with only "purebred" cats tracing back to original stock being accepted for
breeding.
Among pro-phenotype breeders, the situation is somewhat different. If it looks like a Siamese in all respects, apart from the new colour, then it is accepted as a Siamese regardless of mixed ancestry several generations back. They accuse the pro-genotype breeders of unnecessary snobbery and point out the dangers of inbreeding. The separation of the new colours of Siamese and Persians is considered artificial since the cats' conformation is unchanged.
As mentioned earlier, pro-genotype cat fanciers lose sight of the fact that
they are registering pedigree cats - pedigree does not mean the same as
purebred! All breeds began based on phenotype i.e. what they looked like.
For example, naturally occurring cats with a particular "look" might gathered
together and called a breed e.g. the British Shorthair or Maine Coon. These are
considered natural breeds. Even where the foundation cats are pedigree members
of different breeds, the new breed is selected for, and refined, according to
its appearance. In the early days of a breed it sometimes becomes necessary to
accept cats of unknown ancestry but appropriate appearance into the breed to
expand the bloodlines and prevent a dangerous level of inbreeding. All breeds
have to start somewhere - and that somewhere has a phenotypic basis.
One danger, pointed out by pro-genotype breeders is that accepting
"lookalike" cats into a breed with a known genotype can introduce unwelcome
unknown genes which could become widespread and result in undesirable traits
later on. If the two faction, pro-genotype and pro-phenotype, diverge any
further, it will result in different variants of breeds being recognised - not
just a split along tradition vs classic vs contemporary lines, but a split along
the lines of "Phenotypic Siamese" and "Genotypic Siamese" with the two strains
no longer being interbred for fear of taining the genotypically "pure" variety.
Isolating a strain to keep its genotype pure means it will inevitably become
inbred.
There needs to be a sensible balance. When enough generations have elapsed,
a descendant far removed from the original outcross is, to all intents and
purposes, purebred. The variation in its genes from the outcross is probably no
greater than the variation due to natural mutation. Breeds in their infancy may
need to pursue phenotypic breeding programs until the gene pool is wide enough
to support breeding along genotypic lines. To revisit the example of Siamese
cats - the early imports may have been seal and the earliest colours seal, blue,
chocolate and lilac, but in their homeland, as I have witnessed on the streets
of Malaysia and Thailand, colourpoint cats occur in all colours! It is only a
quirk of cat fancy history that has led to those first four colours being
declared true Siamese colours and the others being considered "introduced"
colours.